Title: Interview with Steven Spielberg at THE PACIFIC Premiere

Added: Mar 9, 2010

Author: EyeBiteTV

Duration: 1:4

Description:
EyeBiteTV Presents: Interview with Steven Spielberg at The Pacific Premiere. THE PACIFIC - a massive, 10-part miniseries exec-produced by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA. February 24, 2010. For more celebrity clips, please check out http://eyebite.tv

Channel: Entertainment

Tags: ua241181  eyebite  eyebitetv  eyebite.tv  eyebites  eyebite tv  the pacific  10-part  miniseries  steven spielberg  tom hanks 


Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)

No comments have been provided.

Your Name:

Your Comment:

Security check *

security image  

Youtube Comments: 22

LIETUVIS3000000 Says:

Mar 13, 2010 - its american war !

Threepwood16 Says:

Apr 13, 2010 - @LIETUVIS3000000 Which Britain fought alone for years

ThePulseDesigns Says:

May 11, 2010 - @Threepwood16 damn right

gs88ref Says:

May 16, 2010 - @Threepwood16 damn right! (2)

kjscfc1863 Says:

Jun 24, 2010 - @Threepwood16 - YOUR FUCKIN DAMN RIGHT!!!!!

bigcheesejov73 Says:

Aug 13, 2010 - Tom Hanks should have listened to Spiberg and not get involved in the politics of the war

LIETUVIS3000000 Says:

Aug 31, 2010 - Europe fought alone bud f--ing america in all wars makes themselves heroes and it is bullshit .

UAstudios Says:

Nov 4, 2010 - @Threepwood16 Which Britain was getting their ass destroyed by Germany?

Threepwood16 Says:

Nov 14, 2010 - @UAstudios Getting our asses destroyed? Hold your guns Chief. We didn't manage to hold onto France but we jolly well held onto Britian, While America butchered just about every operation they were involved in. i'm not gonna argue details with a uneducated boy, go read your american history books and stroke your ego.

UAstudios Says:

Dec 6, 2010 - @Threepwood16 Im not quite sure why people accuse me of being egotistical, and I have little to no patriotism for my country. If I recall England was in dire state during the war for example, buzzbomb attacks and aerial strikes were pretty much taking their toll. Now let us case a scenario that what if the US did not join the war alongside Britiain on the Western Front. With Germany's technological advances and superior military powers it would be quite obvious the fall of Britiain.. (Next com.)

UAstudios Says:

Dec 6, 2010 - @Threepwood16 To occur, Britain I have to hand did have a mighty Air Force, (R.A.F) but what else would you grasp onto? Russia?? Russia would of been annihilated without the intense battles happening in the Western Front from the United States. Now a large key of Germany's defeat would've been the fact that half the military was on the eastern front and half was on the western front. Without Germany attacking the US's troops Russia would be Outgunned. Which leads me to another point about...

UAstudios Says:

Dec 6, 2010 - @Threepwood16 Russia, the only reason Russia was a decent key role to the Victory in Europe was the fact the United States had been constantly transporting goods and weapons to the Soviet Union. Now without the US involved all those weapons would've never been transported. Thus making Russia pratically weaponless and outgunned as I said before. So now with that said, Britain and Russia would of not won the war, By the time there was a decent victory on Germany. Their technology(v2)for example...

UAstudios Says:

Dec 6, 2010 - @Threepwood16 Would of rained down and cost mass damages throughout the Soviet's army. Now let me get one thing straight here, I am not dissing Britian in anyway, without Britain and Russia in the war the US would of not beat them, It really was all of the three countries together which conquered Germany. So I am not trying to deprive England, they had the 'speacil forces' and the 'speacil veichles' which played key roles (Glider Planes) (SAS operatives) (Self-Proppelled Artillary) ect...

UAstudios Says:

Dec 6, 2010 - @UAstudios I am just stating that Germany would of had twice the more troops attacking Russia, and alot more time to expand and mass more weapons. Russia would most likely have to get everyone together and try to create as many factories as possible to get their own weapons, and Britiain would be getting Blown up, from Battleships, aerial strikes, and rocket strikes (v1) (v2). haha Sorry for having to comment all this.

Gool349 Says:

Jan 24, 2011 - i enjoyed Savin ovt Ryan, and I watched brothers in arms in like one week but after the pacific i thought...ok now they absolute WW2 fanatics

Dorisequador Says:

Jan 25, 2011 - @Threepwood16 Yes everybody thinks hey everybody else won the war England droped and faught for years before they got help and germany didn't want to fight them. he was getting weaker because of them to take on countries he actually wanted and hated the fact he was loosing so much to England for nothing. Russia supplied them then germany turned on them nobody saw that one coming. USA joined in because thery had enough of these so called supper powers attacking them. You are totally right.

Dorisequador Says:

Jan 25, 2011 - Love stevens professionalizm making movies. He is a top gun beyond others.

stockinettestitch Says:

Mar 21, 2011 - @LIETUVIS3000000 We were trying to stay out of it butt munch. Then we get knocked for that, when we get involved, because we were attacked, we're doing it to make ourselves heroes? You're a douche.

1eyroberts Says:

May 9, 2011 - Mr. Spieberg, If you remember, we were supposed to make a movie,"The She Devils. The story about the end of the world and the women took over. It was cancelled with the lawyers because of Sept. 11. My sister died and I have the rights to make the film, if you are still interested. I think you still have a copy of the book. My email is, EyRoberts@Hotmail.net. She lived in Lima, Peru and was American.

MrBond8821 Says:

Sep 19, 2011 - Spielberg: Obscenely Overrated, Outdated... and just Plain OLD

MrBond8821 Says:

Sep 19, 2011 - @LIETUVIS3000000 Let's send Spielberg to the front lines so he can confront his ignorance. Too bad he would not make it long enough to write a single word about it.